As preparations for the upcoming summit between President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin intensify, there is a growing call for a strategic approach akin to that of former President Ronald Reagan’s meeting with Mikhail Gorbachev in Reykjavik. The focus is on achieving substantive outcomes rather than symbolic gestures that could potentially undermine existing sanctions against Russia.

Analysts suggest that Trump’s engagement with Putin should prioritize concrete agreements that address key geopolitical issues, rather than mere optics. A White House official speaking on condition of anonymity emphasized the need for a results-oriented approach, stating, “The summit should not be a platform for grandstanding but a forum for constructive dialogue on pressing matters.”

Drawing parallels to Reagan’s Reykjavik summit in 1986, where the focus was on reducing nuclear arsenals, experts argue that Trump should seek to make tangible progress on critical issues such as arms control, cybersecurity, and regional conflicts. A legal expert noted, “A substantive agreement that addresses these issues would not only benefit both countries but also contribute to global stability.”

However, some critics caution against a hasty or overly conciliatory approach, citing ongoing tensions between the US and Russia on various fronts, including election meddling and territorial disputes. While diplomatic engagement is crucial, they stress the importance of maintaining a firm stance on issues that directly impact national security.

In the lead-up to the summit, the question remains whether Trump will adopt a Reagan-esque strategy of firm negotiation or opt for a different approach. With geopolitical stakes high and public scrutiny intense, the outcome of the summit and the strategies employed by the two leaders will undoubtedly shape the future trajectory of US-Russia relations.