Republican Brad Raffensperger, the incumbent Georgia secretary of state known for his stance against former President Donald Trump’s efforts to challenge the state’s 2020 election outcome, has announced his candidacy for the gubernatorial race in 2026. Raffensperger’s decision to run for governor comes in the wake of his high-profile role in upholding the integrity of Georgia’s electoral process during the contentious aftermath of the last presidential election.

In a statement released on Wednesday, Raffensperger expressed his commitment to serving the people of Georgia and outlined his vision for the future of the state. He emphasized the importance of upholding election integrity and ensuring that every vote counts, underlining his previous actions as secretary of state as a testament to his dedication to democratic principles.

Raffensperger’s announcement has sparked both support and criticism within the Republican Party. While some view him as a principled defender of electoral norms, others remain critical of his refusal to align with Trump’s baseless claims of widespread voter fraud. The upcoming gubernatorial race is expected to draw national attention, given Raffensperger’s role in the broader debate surrounding election integrity and the future direction of the Republican Party.

Political analysts suggest that Raffensperger’s candidacy could further deepen the divide within the GOP between those who prioritize adherence to democratic processes and those who continue to espouse unfounded allegations of election malfeasance. As the race unfolds, Raffensperger’s platform and messaging are likely to focus on his record of upholding election integrity, appealing to voters on both sides of the political spectrum.

Reflecting on his decision to enter the governor’s race, Raffensperger remains steadfast in his commitment to upholding the rule of law and ensuring fair and transparent elections. His candidacy sets the stage for a closely watched political contest that will not only shape the future of Georgia but also have broader implications for the national discourse on electoral integrity and the role of state officials in safeguarding democratic processes.